🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.